Summary and comparison of microbiota characterized in the present study with those identified from fecal samples in previous studies
TaxonsMean (%)Fold changep-valueLiteratures
ControlASD
PhylumProteobacteria49.1235.30↓ 0.720.01**↓ [19]; ↑ [13]
Firmicutes24.9633.07↑ 1.330.03*↓ [13]; ↑ [15]
Actinobacteria10.9111.74↑ 1.080.56↓ [13]
Bacteroidetes5.858.62↑ 1.470.11↑ [13]; ↓ [15]; ↓ [19]
Verrucomicrobia0.582.37↑ 4.120.02*↓ [19]
ClassBetaproteobacteria10.096.26↓ 0.620.10↑ [15]
OrderClostridiales11.5915.38↑ 1.330.18↑ [15]
FamilyRuminococcaceae5.466.11↑ 1.120.68↑ [15]
Lachnospiraceae3.122.57↓ 0.820.54↑ [15]
Corynebacterium2.603.38↑ 1.30.34↑ [11]
Alcaligenaceae2.530.12↓ 0.050.00**↑ [16]
Pseudomonas7.485.10↓ 0.680.03*↑ [21]
Lactobacillus2.565.45↑ 2.130.08↑ [18]; ↑ [11]
Bacteroides2.482.93↑ 1.180.65↑ [13]; ↑ [21]
Staphylococcus2.232.57↑ 1.150.66↓ [21]
Faecalibacterium2.142.05↓ 0.960.90↑ [20]
Bifidobacterium1.900.80↓ 0.420.06↓ [13]; ↓ [18]; ↓ [21]; ↓ [17]
Streptococcus1.584.77↑ 3.030.02*↓ [13]; ↓ [21]
Akkermansia0.522.35↑ 4.520.02*↓ [19]; ↓ [17]
Blautia0.470.28↓ 0.590.38↓ [20]
Enterococcus0.400.78↑ 1.920.06↑ [21]; ↓ [18]
Collinsella0.370.11↓ 0.290.16↓ [13]; ↑ [11]
Veillonella0.370.50↑ 1.340.43↓ [11]
Lactococcus0.350.11↓ 0.30.16↓ [13]; ↓ [21]
[Ruminococcus]0.340.15↓ 0.450.16↓ [13]
Coprococcus0.280.27↓ 0.940.90↓ [19]
Leuconostoc0.270.01↓ 0.020.14↓ [13]
Dialister0.231.39↑ 6.160.18↓ [13]; ↓ [11]
Parabacteroides0.210.18↓ 0.830.76↓ [11]; ↑ [13]
Weissella0.210.07↓ 0.310.33↓ [13]
Turicibacter0.190.02↓ 0.120.07↓ [13]
Dorea0.170.10↓ 0.60.44↑ [11]
Clostridium0.110.31↑ 2.720.09↑ [21]; ↓ [13]
[Prevotella]0.090.12↑ 1.340.74↑ [21]; ↓ [19]
Desulfovibrio0.040.48↑ 10.880.00**↑ [13]; ↓ [19]
Genus0.030.37↑ 11.530.08↑ [21]

The microbiota whose percent composition were significantly different in ASD subjects as characterized in the present study were compared with those identified from fecal samples in previous studies. ↑ and ↓ denote an increase and decrease in the percent composition, respectively. * and ** denote significant differences between the indicated groups at p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively (Student's t-test).

Exp Neurobiol 2017;26:307~317 https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.307
© Exp Neurobiol