Classification results of methods with ABIDE data
Type | Number of Subjects | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kong et al. [10] | 172 | 90.4 | -- | -- |
Plitt et al. [11] | 178 | 95.2 | 94.9 | 95.6 |
Chen et al. [12] | 252 | 91 | 89 | 93 |
Abraham et al. [32] | 871 | 66.9 | 53.2 | 78.3 |
Nielsen et al. [15] | 964 | 60.0 | -- | -- |
Dvornek et al. [13] | 1100 | 68.5 | -- | -- |
Heinsfeld et al. [14] | 1035 | 70 | 74 | 63 |
Eslami et al. [17] | 1035 | 70.3 | 68.3 | 72.2 |
Ghiassian et al. [16] | 1111 | 59.2 | -- | -- |
Proposed | 1054 | 72.2 | 68.8 | 75.4 |